Delta Lenses and Opfibrations

Michael Johnson, Robert Rosebrugh

Abstract


We compare the delta lenses, also known as d-lenses, of Diskin et al. with the c-lenses, known to be equivalent to opfibrations, already studied by the authors.  Contrary to expectation a c-lens is a d-lens but not conversely. This result is surprising because d-lenses appear to provide the same information as c-lenses, and some more besides, suggesting that the implication would be the reverse -- a d-lens would appear to be a special kind of c-lens. The source of the surprise can be traced to the way the two concepts deal differently with morphisms in a certain base comma category $(G,1_\bV)$.  Both c-lenses and d-lenses are important because they extend the notion of lens to take account of the information available in known transitions between states and this has important implications in practice.


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/tuj.eceasst.57.875

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/tuj.eceasst.57.875.866

Hosted By Universitätsbibliothek TU Berlin.